<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Fedorpheux.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fedorpheux.com/blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fedorpheux.com/blog</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the world</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 15:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Anatomy of an All-Nighter</title>
		<link>http://www.fedorpheux.com/blog/2008/05/08/anatomy-of-an-all-nighter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fedorpheux.com/blog/2008/05/08/anatomy-of-an-all-nighter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 19:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fedorpheux</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[College]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[all-nighters]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[essay]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[finals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fedorpheux.com/blog/?p=169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following is a journal of sorts that I started writing last night shortly after I realized I was going to have to pull an emergency all night for a final that I forgot about (in addition to another paper that I still had to work on some). The times for each update are accurate [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The following is a journal of sorts that I started writing last night shortly after I realized I was going to have to pull an emergency all night for a final that I forgot about (in addition to another paper that I still had to work on some). The times for each update are accurate and nothing has been edited.</em></p>
<p><strong>8:30pm</strong> - About 10 minutes ago, I came to the realization that I had entirely forgotten about one of my classes (in terms of final exams). I could&#8217;ve sworn that not 2 weeks ago, I had talked to the professor and teaching assistant (TA) and turned in a hefty assignment (around 10-12 pages or so). Upon checking with my school&#8217;s online course system (which is far from perfect and, often, far from useful), my worst fears came true. Not only did I totally forget about it, but it was due this morning. As in around 12 hours ago. And I haven&#8217;t started&#8230;yet. I&#8217;m thoroughly fucked and have a long night ahead of me, but getting some points for a late paper is much better than getting zero points for a non-existant paper.</p>
<p><strong>9:09pm</strong> - Just got back from my first break. Once I got organized and created a rather specific plan for my work, I decided that it was time to take a break (and check on the Yankees score, which is still zero by the way). Now that the inning is finished, as is my (first) cup of coffee, I am back to work with a sombre yet markedly positive demeanor.</p>
<p><strong>9:48pm</strong> - Solid work has been accomplished, so time for a break. This time, it&#8217;ll be old chinese food to accompany old episodes of Arrested Development. Work will be resumed soon enough.</p>
<p><strong>10:25pm</strong> - Hunger satiated, now it&#8217;s back to work. I am still optimistic but am working with a strong sense of urgency.</p>
<p><strong>11:35pm</strong> - Enjoying the second cup of coffee, but starting to notice a sense mental drifting&#8230; It&#8217;s not that I&#8217;m tired (hell, I slept in until 11am today), but the laziness is trying to take hold.</p>
<p><strong>12:15am</strong> - Changed Pandora stations and now starting the third cup of coffee. I need something more upbeat than the classical music that I have been listening to for the last 3 and a half hours. Additionally, I am starting to freak out a little bit&#8230;then again, I always do that about this time of night.</p>
<p><strong>12:40am</strong> - I believe that, despite the fact that I have probably sacrificed a significant deal of quality at this point, I am half-way done. Time for a break.</p>
<p><strong>1:08am</strong> - Some of my comrades have decided to jump ship and have ceased work to watch a movie. If I work at the same rate as I have been so far, I won&#8217;t be done until around 5am. I plan to work faster.</p>
<p><strong>2:55am</strong> - I have just returned from a break celebrating the 3/4 mark in my work. I enjoyed it by watching some of the movie <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0123755/">Cube</a> as well as some GTA4 being played.</p>
<p><strong>5:28am</strong> - My pace slowed drastically, but I am finally done. The paper will need some final touching up in the morning, but I must sleep at least a few hours now. Maybe it&#8217;s just because I probably should&#8217;ve taken out my contact lenses hours ago, but I&#8217;m starting to see some weird shit.</p>
<p><strong>9:17am</strong> - I slept in later than was planned, but I&#8217;m confident that I can still make the noon deadline (even if I wasn&#8217;t I don&#8217;t have too much of a choice about the matter at this point). Rejuvinated by the nap, I&#8217;m optimistic about the rest of the work.</p>
<p><strong>2:54pm</strong> - I got in touch with the TA and turned everything in. Fucking done&#8230; Note to self: try not to forget about any finals next semester.</p>
<p><em>I know that, since I took that nap for a couple hours, this wasn&#8217;t technically a full all-nighter. Nonetheless, I think it is a relatively accurate representation of what often happens when people claim to pull all-nighters.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fedorpheux.com/blog/2008/05/08/anatomy-of-an-all-nighter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Exercise Equipment Industry</title>
		<link>http://www.fedorpheux.com/blog/2008/04/29/the-exercise-equipment-industry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fedorpheux.com/blog/2008/04/29/the-exercise-equipment-industry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 19:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fedorpheux</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fedorpheux.com/blog/?p=168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s an inherent flaw in the exercise equipment industry that also happens to be the reason why I don&#8217;t own any exercise equipment nor do I have plans to own any. Consider the following back and forth discussion:
Why do we, as a society, have exercise equipment?
To stay in shape and keep our bodies healthy.
Why do [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s an inherent flaw in the exercise equipment industry that also happens to be the reason why I don&#8217;t own any exercise equipment nor do I have plans to own any. Consider the following back and forth discussion:</p>
<p>Why do we, as a society, have exercise equipment?<br />
<i>To stay in shape and keep our bodies healthy.</i><br />
Why do we want to stay in shape and keep our bodies healthy?<br />
<i>So that we can live long and satisfying lives.</i><br />
And we spend a noticeable amount of time in our life exercising and working enough to pay for the equipment that we buy.<br />
<i>Well, yes.</i><br />
Now that we have established the foundation of the situation, allow me to get right at the heart of the issue. Why do we build and use equipment that is supposed to improve many aspects of our health, such as strength and flexibility, when we have been living for thousands of years without this equipment? Not only had we been doing fine during those thousands of years, now the world (and especially our country) is filled with fat lazy assholes. These are the same assholes that have infinitely more resources at their disposal yet still keep their body in worse shape than the average caveman. The funniest part is that it&#8217;s these same assholes that buy most of the exercise equipment. Not only are they fat and lazy, but they&#8217;re dumb enough to fall for the infomercials.<br />
<i>But the exercise equipment allows intelligent and proactive people to keep their bodies in even better shape than they would be able to without the equipment.</i><br />
First of all, I would argue that the number of these people is incredibly small compared to the number of the aforementioned fat lazy assholes. But more importantly, what are we doing with these super fit bodies that this equipment allows us to mold? We, meaning the majority of modern American society, are not the hunter gatherers of the stone age nor are we even the simple but hard-working farmers of a couple decades ago. We use these bodies for several different things but they all achieve the same end: making you desire your body to be in similar shape and making you feel bad when it isn&#8217;t like that, which is usually the case.<br />
<i>So you&#8217;re saying that we should all stop buying exercise equipment and turn into fat lazy slobs together?</i><br />
No, certainly not. People should still exercise; my argument is against the equipment. Instead of buying some ridiculous &#8220;Aeronox version 2.0 Extreme Sport Utility Edition&#8221; or whatever they call them these days, maybe you could go take a jog and then use rocks, small logs, cinder blocks, or similar materials for resistance. Or, if you really want to be proactive, (literally) run down to the store, pick up some milk, bring it back, and then clean out the garage. If you plan it right, you&#8217;ll use all the same muscles and give them just as good a workout. The only difference is that instead of moving the same heavy thing back and forth over the same distance of around 6 inches about 200 times, you can actually get something productive done.</p>
<p>So that&#8217;s as far as I have the conversation going so far. Feel free to add your replies in the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fedorpheux.com/blog/2008/04/29/the-exercise-equipment-industry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The &#8216;X&#8217; and The &#8216;Y&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.fedorpheux.com/blog/2008/04/28/the-x-and-the-y/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fedorpheux.com/blog/2008/04/28/the-x-and-the-y/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 01:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fedorpheux</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fedorpheux.com/blog/?p=167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	I believe that every action in the world can be entirely represented using just two terms. As there isn&#8217;t any acceptable word in American English that properly carries the weight of either of these two concepts, simply ascribe that role to the letters &#8216;X&#8217; and &#8216;Y&#8217;. Every time &#8216;X&#8217; is mentioned or referred to, think [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>	I believe that every action in the world can be entirely represented using just two terms. As there isn&#8217;t any acceptable word in American English that properly carries the weight of either of these two concepts, simply ascribe that role to the letters &#8216;X&#8217; and &#8216;Y&#8217;. Every time &#8216;X&#8217; is mentioned or referred to, think of it as one of these two otherwise unnameable ideas. Apply this similarly to &#8216;Y&#8217; and note that &#8216;X&#8217; is not only different than &#8216;Y&#8217; but is essentially the opposite.<br />
	&#8216;X&#8217; actions follow the pattern of adding energy into a system, thus complicating it more and giving it more potential energy, to compare it to Newtonian physics. &#8216;Y&#8217; actions, as you might guess are those that follow the pattern of releasing energy from a system. I describe them as following the pattern of transferring energy one way or the other because I mean to apply this to all that qualifies under the broad term “actions.” Specifically, I mean to include political actions, interpersonal relationships, and one&#8217;s internal thought process, among many other things.<br />
<span id="more-167"></span><br />
	For an easy example to start out with, consider the general idea of a lazy person (or a person that is behaving in a lazy manner). That would be classified as associated with &#8216;Y&#8217;. How exactly it is associated with &#8216;Y&#8217; can be a difficult question. In this case, one might say that laziness is <em>motivated by</em> &#8216;Y&#8217; or is a &#8216;Y&#8217;-<em>type behavior</em>. The logic supporting this association has to do with considering the aspects of laziness. It is defined by not keeping certain commitments or following through with certain responsibilities. It requires a release of control over what is normally a heavily controlled aspect of life: one&#8217;s own schedule. It takes effort, time, and energy to create, use, and maintain a tight and efficient schedule. That is why it is associated with &#8216;Y&#8217; and, conversely, an uptight and strictly scheduled pattern of behavior would be associated with &#8216;X&#8217;.<br />
	A straight-forward example relating to physics would be that of an electron&#8217;s energy level. An electron going from a high-energy orbit to a low-energy orbit releases energy in that action. To get it back up to a high-energy orbit requires energy to be put into the system. While the representations of energy vary from case to case, I believe that these two terms, the &#8216;X&#8217; and the &#8216;Y&#8217;, serve their purpose effectively every time.<br />
	This notion, of course, begs the question; what is the point of viewing reality in this way? To many people, there is no point because they simply aren&#8217;t interested in this kind of thought. Some people, however, may enjoy combining it with their other beliefs regarding reality. Personally, I have a rather sparse ontology so there isn&#8217;t much to combine this concept with. Being an atheist, the only irrational belief that I have is some sense of karma. This can be explained by phrases such as <em>you get what you pay for</em> or <em>treat people how you would like to be treated</em>. To me, it&#8217;s the general notion that things work out to follow a certain form. I don&#8217;t mean to assume that some greater power is working things out this way but more that things just do work out this way due to the nature of the universe. Think of it as similar to the ying and the yang; the &#8216;X&#8217; and the &#8216;Y&#8217;.<br />
	These two competing forces can be seen in all aspects of life. When one looks for the representations of these two forces among their personal life experiences, they can use this knowledge to their advantage. Recognition of these forces leads to recognition of their common patterns which means that you can mentally prepare yourself for what&#8217;s coming. One way that I practice this in my life is using it to help me focus my energy and efforts. In other words, I do my best to recognize which of my possible tasks (&#8217;X') provides the best reward (&#8217;Y'). For example, which college course teaches me the most and allows me to get the best grade? Which major will lead me to a satisfying and financially rewarding career? Once I decide, I focus my energy on those tasks that I find important and divert it away from those that are less important.<br />
	If this seems like a vague concept in general, then I feel that I have succeeded. I view this as being a vague concept. It can be applied to so many different situations and can be represented in so many different ways, some people may feel that it looses any meaning or usefulness. I maintain, however, that this view can be successfully adopted and can increase one&#8217;s enjoyment of life. It is neither a final nor a perfect concept, but hopefully a starting place for further thought on the matter by all who are intrigued.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fedorpheux.com/blog/2008/04/28/the-x-and-the-y/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s Better When You Just Buy It</title>
		<link>http://www.fedorpheux.com/blog/2007/10/16/its-better-when-you-just-buy-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fedorpheux.com/blog/2007/10/16/its-better-when-you-just-buy-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 23:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fedorpheux</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fedorpheux.com/main/?p=164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I keep seeing these new Ebay commercials on TV trying to convince me that I should enjoy &#8216;winning&#8217; something as opposed to simply just buying it. They all depict different situations of winning something, such as a football game where the football is replaced by some fancy vase.
These commercials could not make me hate the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I keep seeing these new Ebay commercials on TV trying to convince me that I should enjoy &#8216;winning&#8217; something as opposed to simply just buying it. They all depict different situations of winning something, such as a football game where the football is replaced by some fancy vase.</p>
<p>These commercials could not make me hate the thought of purchasing something any more. We&#8217;re a civilized society (well, not always the case, but go with it)! We don&#8217;t have to club each other over the head for the last piece of meat anymore. We have developed a complex system of trading goods and services that uses a little thing called money. Money is an amazing thing because you can give it to somebody and then they will either give you something or do something for you, sometimes both. There&#8217;s no competition between the buyer and the seller. There is, of course, competition between sellers. That does not mean, however, that we should create competition between the buyers.</p>
<p>A big counterpoint to this whole rant would be the existence of auctions, beyond just Ebay. People have been auctioning stuff for a gazillion years, and it looks like it will continue to happen until the end of the world on December 23, 2012. In defense of my original point, I see auctions as a method of selling something adapted to the situation that the good or service being sold is somehow unique or special and many people want it. This applies just as well to limited edition Ferraris as it does to the cupcake that the lucky kid has at the lunch table in the cafeteria. But if, for example, the lunch lady was selling those cupcakes then the auction would be rather worthless. Even if it was sold for cheaper than what the lunch lady was selling it for, only one person reaps the benefit of that deal while the rest ignore the whole thing and head for the counter. In the case of Ebay, it&#8217;s like there are a bunch of cupcake kids filling up the cafeteria, but the lunch lady is still there. The best part about the lunch lady is that she is reliable whereas nobody knows what those cupcake kids did to their merchandise. Hell, maybe one of them is a prince from Nigeria that will give you a fortune if you just let him borrow a few hundred dollars from you.</p>
<p>Ebay&#8217;s recent advertising campaign is just another step backwards in this wonderfully-mediocre culture of ours. And yes, I do think that it is kind of funny that my Half.com (Ebay) profile is one of the first results when <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=fedorpheux" target="_blank">googling &#8216;fedorpheux&#8217;</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fedorpheux.com/blog/2007/10/16/its-better-when-you-just-buy-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who is Tyler Perry?</title>
		<link>http://www.fedorpheux.com/blog/2007/10/16/who-is-tyler-perry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fedorpheux.com/blog/2007/10/16/who-is-tyler-perry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 18:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fedorpheux</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fedorpheux.com/main/?p=163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t who this guy is, but apparently he likes tacking his name onto the titles of shitty movies (&#8221;Tyler Perry&#8217;s [insert title of shitty movie here]&#8220;). According to the basic rules of grammar, that means that those movies belong to him. But I guess in the context of the movie industry, it would mean [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t who this guy is, but apparently he likes tacking his name onto the titles of shitty movies (&#8221;Tyler Perry&#8217;s <em>[insert title of shitty movie here]</em>&#8220;). According to the basic rules of grammar, that means that those movies belong to him. But I guess in the context of the movie industry, it would mean something more like he made that movie&#8230;single-handedly. Now if he did actually manage to come up with all the ideas, write everything, provide personal funding for himself, run all of the cameras and audio equipment, do all of the acting of all the roles in front of the camera, and whatever else is involved in the making of a movie, then more power to him. But something tells me he didn&#8217;t do that.</p>
<p>So who is Tyler Perry? I don&#8217;t know, I don&#8217;t care, and I&#8217;m sure as hell sick of seeing his name all over the place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fedorpheux.com/blog/2007/10/16/who-is-tyler-perry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Physics of Falling</title>
		<link>http://www.fedorpheux.com/blog/2007/07/25/physics-of-falling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fedorpheux.com/blog/2007/07/25/physics-of-falling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fedorpheux</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fedorpheux.com/main/?p=162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First off, let me say that I am actually completely sober and have been while thinking up this idea. Now, try to follow me on this:
Imagine a spider on your ceiling. I know most spiders don&#8217;t really behave this way but now just imagine it simply lets go of the ceiling and falls to the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off, let me say that I am actually completely sober and have been while thinking up this idea. Now, try to follow me on this:</p>
<p>Imagine a spider on your ceiling. I know most spiders don&#8217;t really behave this way but now just imagine it simply lets go of the ceiling and falls to the floor. No web or anything, just free fall to the floor. What do you think it would do? Would it be splattered into a little mush or would it just flip over and scurry under the nearest large object? I put my money on the scurrying.</p>
<p>Your average ceiling is about 8 feet above the floor, so that&#8217;s 96 inches. Your average spider isn&#8217;t very big but just for the sake of easy math, lets say he&#8217;s 1 inch tall. That&#8217;s a fall of almost 100 times the creature&#8217;s own height. Now compare this to a human. Take a 6 foot tall human and raise him up to 100 times his height: 600 feet. A drop like that and the human would definitely splatter and no scurrying would be possible.</p>
<p>I know spiders have fancy exoskeletons and humans don&#8217;t and there are plenty of other biological differences, but that&#8217;s not my point. My point has to do with how fast they fall. Anybody who took science in middle school knows that gravity is (just about) the same everywhere on earth and one thing wont fall any faster than another thing, regardless of mass. It&#8217;s the classic feather and bowling ball trick; they fall at the same speed. The catch, as most of you should know, is that the feather and bowling ball will not fall at the same speed on Earth due to air resistance. It&#8217;s a similar deal with the human and the spider. The ratio of surface area (creating air resistance) to mass is drastically different between the two. But most everybody should have realized that before they even started reading this paragraph.</p>
<p>So my point of all this is about trying to imagine an environment that is filled with a certain gas that is denser than oxygen, nitrogen, and whatever else we have here on earth. Something dense enough that it provide enough resistance that we could fall 100 times our own height and walk it off. Maybe a few scrapes and bruises, but no splatter or mush. The concept is very similar to how astronauts train for spacewalks in giant swimming pools. It mimics how they would feel in space. But I&#8217;m not trying to mimic that feeling as much as I&#8217;m trying to mimic that falling spider phenomenon.</p>
<p>These are the kind of thoughts that go through my head while I&#8217;m sitting at home on the crapper and see a spider on the ceiling&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fedorpheux.com/blog/2007/07/25/physics-of-falling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Speak Up A Bit?</title>
		<link>http://www.fedorpheux.com/blog/2007/07/16/speak-up-a-bit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fedorpheux.com/blog/2007/07/16/speak-up-a-bit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fedorpheux</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fedorpheux.com/main/?p=161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a great way to piss random people off: talk just a little bit too quietly for the target to properly hear you. This works best in a noisy environment where it is easy to blame other factors. When they ask you to speak up, acknowledge them and act is if you are trying to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a great way to piss random people off: talk just a little bit too quietly for the target to properly hear you. This works best in a noisy environment where it is easy to blame other factors. When they ask you to speak up, acknowledge them and act is if you are trying to speak louder, but don&#8217;t actually speak any louder. Lather, rinse, and repeat until either the person walks away or you walk away with a black eye.</p>
<p>Seriously, though, this really pisses me off. My technique to combat this if I ever find myself at the raw end of this deal is to simply begin talking louder and louder once I realize the other person refuses to be reasonably audible. They either think I&#8217;m crazy or deaf, and at least one of those isn&#8217;t too far from the truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fedorpheux.com/blog/2007/07/16/speak-up-a-bit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Thought on Corporate Mass Media</title>
		<link>http://www.fedorpheux.com/blog/2007/02/22/160/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fedorpheux.com/blog/2007/02/22/160/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 00:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fedorpheux</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fedorpheux.com/main/?p=160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I check out the Google News top stories and I see &#8220;Cheney to Make Rare Visit to Australia&#8221; and went on with my business.
The next time I refreshed the list of top stories, right where the previous Cheney story was, displayed &#8220;Dragging the Cheney.&#8221;
&#8230;and yet some people still wonder why I have no faith in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I check out the Google News top stories and I see &#8220;<a href="http://www.abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory?id=2894563" target="_blank">Cheney to Make Rare Visit to Australia</a>&#8221; and went on with my business.<br />
The next time I refreshed the list of top stories, right where the previous Cheney story was, displayed &#8220;<a href="http://bulletin.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=228881" target="_blank">Dragging the Cheney</a>.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230;and yet some people still wonder why I have no faith in corporate mass media, especially when it comes to reporting news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fedorpheux.com/blog/2007/02/22/160/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PS3 Controllers Double as Handguns?</title>
		<link>http://www.fedorpheux.com/blog/2006/12/04/ps3-controllers-double-as-handguns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fedorpheux.com/blog/2006/12/04/ps3-controllers-double-as-handguns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 01:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fedorpheux</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fedorpheux.com/main/?p=159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently got wind of this story about a college student who was shot dead by police who were trying to arrest him for stealing 2 Playstation 3&#8217;s on November 17th from another college student. (This is when you should read or at least skim the article for the details)
As I interpret this story, this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently got wind of <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/04/AR2006120400334.html" target="_blank">this story</a> about a college student who was shot dead by police who were trying to arrest him for stealing 2 Playstation 3&#8217;s on November 17th from another college student. (This is when you should read or at least skim the article for the details)</p>
<p>As I interpret this story, this is just another painfully frustrating example of extremely poor decision making on the cops. It seems as though they had very poor threat assessment and generally poor arresting procedure, likely a result of poor training. This is what happens when any jack-off can go to any hole-in-the-wall community college for 2 years while working his shitty fast-food job to finance it and come out with a shiny new badge and a gun (with a fancy holster, no less). These days, cops will describe anything as a life-threatening situation in order to defend their morbid actions. Even worse, juries will often buy it. The additional variable of the German shepherd (also shot and killed) does not surprise me in the least. I know from personal experience that law enforcement officers will freak out when a citizen just happens to own a German shepherd, whether it is truly a threatening situation or not. I understand that they are probably trained to be careful around large and potentially dangerous animals, but that doesn&#8217;t imply that every single animal that fits that description necessarily <i>is</i> dangerous.</p>
<p>Before you get ahead of yourself, Mr. (or Mrs.) Anonymous Reader, don&#8217;t even bother generalizing my statements to make it sound like I hate all cops or I believe cops can go around killing whoever they want without any repercussions. My point is simply that the situation described in the news article bothers me quite a bit and I&#8217;m sick of seeing shit like that going down as often as it is, or ever. Honestly, becoming a law enforcement officer should require more education and once the officer has his job, he should be continually attending various training and educational sessions regarding all sorts of topics that would improve their law enforcing skills. In all practicality, however, that is not going to happen. My conclusion? Anarchy rules all. When entropy makes the world go around, as it always does, my strategy is to have more firepower than the other guy (whoever the other guy might be).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fedorpheux.com/blog/2006/12/04/ps3-controllers-double-as-handguns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Slippery Deposits</title>
		<link>http://www.fedorpheux.com/blog/2006/11/08/slippery-deposits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fedorpheux.com/blog/2006/11/08/slippery-deposits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 16:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fedorpheux</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fedorpheux.com/main/?p=158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are a lot of highly useless and stupid man-made processes and it is hard to rank them all, or even just the top 20. One that definitely deserves to be somewhere up there on the Oh-god-why-has-this-abomination-been-set-loose-on-humanity List is the deposit slip. Let me be clear that I am not against the deposit slip as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a lot of highly useless and stupid man-made processes and it is hard to rank them all, or even just the top 20. One that definitely deserves to be somewhere up there on the Oh-god-why-has-this-abomination-been-set-loose-on-humanity List is the deposit slip. Let me be clear that I am not against the deposit slip as a whole. I think that if somebody is depositing some form of money into a machine or some drop-box or anywhere that does not currently have a human teller to talk to, then such slips are highly useful. But those are the <i>only</i> situations for deposit slips! Period.</p>
<p>When you go to your bank and make deposits in such a way that you&#8217;re interacting with an actual teller, no deposit slips are needed and no deposit slips should ever be asked for. If the teller requests that you use one, they are essentially saying that they are less competent than the little hinged-door covering the drop box that was installed by the middle-school drop-out meth-head of a janitor 17 years ago, which has long-since rusted and has more diseases on it than Courtney Love&#8217;s cervix. The part that frustrates me the most is the fact that, in order to make themselves appear somewhat human, the tellers let you know that you don&#8217;t really need to fill out all of the fields on the slip. They will need your account number, but they don&#8217;t really need that if you carry your bank card with you, as I do. Other than that, all they really need is your name and the total amount of money being deposited. Well, useless sacks of body fluid, that information is on the check to begin with! Oh, depositing more than one check? Well that gives the teller who has to concentrate quite a bit just to breathe yet another chance to see your name and the amount! Oh, but now you have to add up the total amount. And what if this poor mentally deficient teller has to deal with checks and cash being deposited at once? That would truly be a shame, for they would have to use all of the addition skills that they learned in 3rd grade to figure out the total amount deposited. Just to fuck with them, try telling them to deposit some of the money into savings and some into checking. When they ask how much into each, just say &#8220;Surprise me&#8221; and then distract yourself with the endless pamphlets about that mortgage that you&#8217;ve always never cared about. You&#8217;ll find their little finger trembling between the F4 button and the F5 button on the keyboard while they try to decide whether to deposit into your savings or checking account first. Just wait until they start trying to figure out how much to put into each. In some cases, the teller may actually collapse and loose consciousness. Oh, and I almost forgot that sometimes these financial harlots covered in cheap make-up have the balls to ask that you write the date down on the precious deposit slip. I figure that even the slowest of bank tellers must catch on to the pattern after the first 10 or so customers all use exactly the same date on their slip. Since I never have my banking transactions at a high enough priority to do them first thing in the day, they tellers should really figure it out by the time I get there. And I&#8217;m convinced that they know the date, because how could they not? In that case, they are basically testing if I know the date or not. Frankly, it&#8217;s none of their damn business. I could be 3 days into a week-long binge of dropping acid and think it was 783 years in the future, but I still feel that I should be able to make a simple deposit of money into my account.</p>
<p>Point being that bank tellers need to get off their high horse and realize that a trained dolphin could do 99% of their job. Hell, it could even be the dolphin who failed training, is missing a fin, and can&#8217;t even swim very well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fedorpheux.com/blog/2006/11/08/slippery-deposits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
